English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This technical report records and discusses the Second Workshop onSustainable Software for Science: Practice and Experiences (WSSSPE2). Thereport includes a description of the alternative, experimental submission andreview process, two workshop keynote presentations, a series of lightningtalks, a discussion on sustainability, and five discussions from the topicareas of exploring sustainability; software development experiences; credit &incentives; reproducibility & reuse & sharing; and code testing & code review.For each topic, the report includes a list of tangible actions that wereproposed and that would lead to potential change. The workshop recognized thatreliance on scientific software is pervasive in all areas of world-leadingresearch today. The workshop participants then proceeded to explore differentperspectives on the concept of sustainability. Key enablers and barriers ofsustainable scientific software were identified from their experiences. Inaddition, recommendations with new requirements such as software credit filesand software prize frameworks were outlined for improving practices insustainable software engineering. There was also broad consensus that formaltraining in software development or engineering was rare among thepractitioners. Significant strides need to be made in building a sense ofcommunity via training in software and technical practices, on increasing theirsize and scope, and on better integrating them directly into graduate educationprograms. Finally, journals can define and publish policies to improvereproducibility, whereas reviewers can insist that authors provide sufficientinformation and access to data and software to allow them reproduce the resultsin the paper. Hence a list of criteria is compiled for journals to provide toreviewers so as to make it easier to review software submitted for publicationas a "Software Paper."

Report on the Second Workshop on Sustainable Software for Science: Practice and Experiences (WSSSPE2)