English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The presence of experts holding patents and simultaneously providing policy advice on areas in which they  hold  these  patents  poses  several normative  questions.  Through  a  comparative  study  of  several IPCC  reports,  this  article  documents  the  scope  of  this  phenomenon  and  discusses  it  with  respect  to  a theory  of  conflict  of  interest.  A  review  of  IPCC  writing  teams  suggests  that  the  presence  of  patent-holders  is  largest  on  issues  of  infrastructure,  industry  and  transport  rather  than  single  technologies. According  to  insights  from  studies  on  conflict  of  interest,  the  presence  of  patent-holders  creates  an increased  risk  of  bias.  This  article  investigates  the  possible  link  between  patenting  and  conflicts  of interest,  according  to  theoretical  and  empirical  insights  into  the  relationship  between  science  and society

Patent-holders on expert committees. Can there be a conflict of interest?