English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Although construction is one of the most dangerous sectors and even though small firms account for about 90% of all firms in the EU, there is little evidence about the role of safety climate as a determinant of safety performance both in the sector and in small firms. Moreover, risk attitude is surprisingly understudied as a determinant of safety performance. There have been few studies of individual risk attitude and safety performance, of which none has used validated or behavioral measures of risk attitude. This study tackles both these issues by collecting data on safety climateiausing Zohar & Luriai¯s (2005) safety climate questionnaireiaand individual risk attitudeiausing Lejuez et al.i¯s (2002) Balloon Analog Risk Task (BART)iain a sample of small firms in the construction sector. The results obtained confirm the leading role of safety climate in explaining safety performance in small construction firms and rejects the hypothesis that behaviorally measured risk attitude has an incremental explanatory power concerning safety performance.

Effects of Individual Risk Attitude, Safety Climate, and Affective Commitment on Safety Compliance