English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This paper shows how bibliometric assessment can be implemented at individuallevel. This has been successfully done at the University of Vienna carried outby the Bibliometrics and Publication Strategies Department of the ViennaUniversity Library. According to the department's philosophy, bibliometrics isnot only a helpful evaluation instrument in order to complement the peer reviewsystem. It is also meant as a compass for researchers in the "publish orperish" dilemma in order to increase general visibility and to optimizepublication strategies. The individual assessment comprises of an interviewwith the researcher under evaluation, the elaboration of a bibliometric reportof the researcher's publication output, the discussion and validation of theobtained results with the researcher under evaluation as well as furtheroptional analyses. The produced bibliometric reports are provided to theresearchers themselves and inform them about the quantitative aspects of theirresearch output. They also serve as a basis for further discussion concerningtheir publication strategies. These reports are eventually intended forinformed peer review practices, and are therefore forwarded to the qualityassurance and the rector's office and finally sent to the peers. The mostimportant feature of the generated bibliometric report is its multidimensionaland individual character. It relies on a variety of basic indicators andfurther control parameters in order to foster comprehensibility. Researchers,administrative staff and peers alike have confirmed the usefulness of thisbibliometric approach. An increasing demand is noticeable. In total, 33bibliometric reports have been delivered so far. Moreover, similar reports havealso been produced for the bibliometric assessment of two faculties with greatsuccess.

Individual Bibliometric Assessment @ University of Vienna: From Numbers to Multidimensional Profiles