English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

A lot has been said and discussed regarding the rationale and significance ofthe Bechdel Score. It became a digital sensation in 2013 when Swedish cinemasbegan to showcase the Bechdel test score of a film alongside its rating. Thetest has drawn criticism from experts and the film fraternity regarding its useto rate the female presence in a movie. The pundits believe that the score istoo simplified and the underlying criteria of a film to pass the test mustinclude 1) at least two women, 2) who have at least one dialogue, 3) aboutsomething other than a man, is egregious. In this research, we have considereda few more parameters which highlight how we represent females in film, likethe number of female dialogues in a movie, dialogue genre, and part of speechtags in the dialogue. The parameters were missing in the existing criteria tocalculate the Bechdel score. The research aims to analyze 342 movies scripts totest a hypothesis if these extra parameters, above with the current Bechdelcriteria, are significant in calculating the female representation score. Theresult of the Principal Component Analysis method concludes that the femaledialogue content is a key component and should be considered while measuringthe representation of women in a work of fiction.

Identifying Missing Component in the Bechdel Test Using Principal Component Analysis Method