English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical performance of direct and indirect composite restorations in endodontically treated posterior teeth for an observation period of 6 months. The study included 65 patients and 126 composite resin restorations - 41 direct (SDR, Ceram X Mono/ Dentsply) and 85 onlays (In:Joy, Dentsply). At baseline and at 6 months they were evaluated using modified USPHS - criteria. Statistical analysis was performed using the Pearson Chi square test and SPSS v.19. There was no statistically significant difference between the results obtained at baseline and after 6 months for both materials (P>.05) The direct and indirect composites demonstrated excellent and promising clinical performance in endodontically treated posterior teeth over evaluation period of 6 months

RESTORATION OF ENDODONTICALLY TREATED POSTERIOR TEETH WITH DIRECT AND INDIRECT COMPOSITE – 6-MONTH RESULTS