English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

SUMMARY: There has been a long-lasting dispute over the question whether the screw or cylindrical implants are better to use. Subantral augmentation is one of the places which gives superiority to screw implants due to the opportunity to ensure their primary stabilization, hence to subject them to a single moment stress and to reduce surgical interventions. The author tests screw implants in three different clinical conditions of the maxillary sinus. The results of the clinical observations confirm the potentials of screw implants in intricate clinical varieties of “sinus procedans”.

Sinus lifting and varieties of subantral implantation in the use of screw intrabone implants