English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Article history: Received July 2, 2012 Received in Revised form August, 26, 2012 Accepted 18 September 2012 Available online September 21 2012 Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is one of the most popular techniques for measuring relative efficiencies of various similar units. However, lack of opportunity to compare the decision making units (DMUs) on the same scale in DEA model can make it less practical to classify DMUs. In this paper, we present common weights for DMUs by applying a scientific methodology utilizing goal programming as one of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques, thereby we deal with improving discrimination power for selecting the efficient DMUs. The paper investigates the validity of the ranking technique, an index called the relative closeness (RC) to the ideal DMU (IDMU). Finally, via a previously reported numerical example, the proposed data envelopment analysis-goal programming (DEAGP) model is compared with that obtained by the DEA-AHP. © 2012 Growing Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

The superiority of DEAGP in ranking decision making units over DEA-AHP method: Utilizing relative closeness to ideal decision making units