English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The polemic that arises relating to the Constitutional Court hearing No. 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010 concerning inheritance rights of children outside of marriage, provide those children with inheritance rights and civil relationship to the father. This can be implemented as science and technology or other evidences that can be accepted by law, prove the blood relationship. This study aims to analyse inheritance law for children outside of marriage in the perspective of Adat law, Burgerlijk Law (BW) and Islamic law. This study uses descriptive qualitative approach. According to Adat law, children outside of marriage does not receive inheritance rights nor inherit from the father, except in the custom of Minahasa for the reason of humanity aspect, which is called Mehelilikur. Burgerlijk Law (BW) article 867 and Islamic law stated that children born outside of marriage or adultery do not receive inheritance or inherit from the father. They have only the right to receive living expenses. In addition, the child born from a betel marriage is valid in Islamic law and has the civil right to his father to receive inheritance and inherit.

Constitutional Court Decision Number 46 / Puu-Viii / 2010 Reviewed from the Perspective of Adat Law, Burgerlijk Wetboek (Bw) and Islamic Law