English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Although recently, touch-based input with a reduced amount of haptic guidance gained popularity, traditional tangible input devices like mice or joysticks are still indispensable of everyday human-computer interaction. Most traditional tangible devices are implemented in so-called device-in-hand settings. There, the user’s hand grabs the device and the device-hand system is then moved to trigger an input activity. Thus, the user’s hand posture usually stays relatively stable. Hand-in-device approaches are an alternative form of tangible interaction settings where the user’s hand moves within a tangible device. Such a setting differs considerably as i) the user’s hand posture is more flexible, and ii) the device itself is stable while the interacting hand moves. This paper describes a comparative study on users’ interaction performance with device-in-hand and hand-indevice settings for simple 3D interaction tasks. Further, it contributes to the body of knowledge on favourable interaction directions (left or right).

Tangible Interaction for Simple 3D Interaction Tasks: Comparing Device-In-Hand and Hand-In-Device Scenarios