English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Partial models are small models produced by splitting a large full model into meaningful conceivable-sized fragments with each separate diagram. They are commonly used when the full model is too large and shared by several people who have their own scope of interest. Those partial models are subject to being manipulatedâ merged for instance. This context calls for discussion in Enterprise Ontology (EO) about the capability of business process modeling languages in handling partial models and manipulations on them. There, indeed, exists a lack of researches in the methodology of EO, namely Design & Engineering Methodology for Organizations (DEMO) for formal studies on its consistency in producing partial models and merging them. It stems from a deficiency of formal semantics in the specification of the notation. By formalizing the DEMO Construction Model (CM) with a concept of well-formed models and the merge operation from a set-theoretic approach, this paper clarifies that the closedness, commutativity, and associativity are guaranteed in merging partial models of DEMO CM. An example of EU-Rent accompanies the formalizations for validation and demonstration.

Does ‘Merging DEMO Models’ Satisfy the Associative Law? - Validation of Partial Models and Merge Operation