English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Both Enterprise Ontology and Normalized Systems can be cons idered as design theories, which provide prescriptive guidelines to design systems. Enterprise Ontolo gy explicitly focuses on the design of organizations as being social systems. Originally, Normalized Systems focu sed on the design of evolvable software systems. However, it has been shown that, building on the Normalized S ystems design knowledge, prescriptions for other domains, such as the business process domain, can be pr oposed as well. This domain seems to overlap at least partially with the domain of Enterprise Ontology, w hich is used to establish claims concerning process design in various publications. However, both theorie s ar based on completely different kernel theories. Therefore, this paper analyzes to which extent the guidelin es proposed for the Normalized Systems Business Processes are consistent, complementing or conflicting wit h prescriptions from Enterprise Ontology. A consistent set of prescriptions could lead to a more integrated pproach for designing integrated organizations, business processes and software systems.

Consistency, Complementalness, or Conflictation of Enterprise Ontology and Normalized Systems Business Process Guidelines