English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Recent comparative law studies have remarked the role of “metalegal” formants for a complete description of legal language. It is necessary to recognize the dialectic character of a social product – as law – which explain the matters related with a legal command effectiveness. Is the subject of legal studies the construction of a method of social analysis? Or any study must take into consideration any particular social experience without possibility to build a general method? In the first case we affirm that in similar social context the normative rules assume a certain degree of similarity. In the second, we deny any logic of the legal experience: thus, every legal system is “singular”. In order to exit from this contrast, we should look at what is moving inside the social organization and realizing the law “as social practice”.

revista da faculdade de direito da ufg

LOOKING FOR THE CAUSES OF A CONVERGENCE: THE CONTRIBUTION OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS ON THE STUDY OF CONTEMPORARY CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - DOI: https://doi.org/10.5216/rfd.v%vi%i.43183