English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

espanolEl presente estudio realizara un estado de la cuestion sobre a la interpretacion de “la cuestion de la mujer” en la obra de Maquiavelo que desde la teoria politica estadounidense se ha llevado a cabo desde principios de la decada de 1980. Se sostendra que las obras analizadas podran ser adscritas a dos grandes paradigmas hermeneuticos: uno que parte de nociones esencializadas del genero que es consolidado desde 1984 por Hanna Pitkin, segun el cual Maquiavelo seria un autor misogino que propondria una politica sin cabida para la mujer o lo femenino, y otro que denominaremos protoconstructivista, surgido en 1985 y capitaneado por Arlene Saxonhouse, en que Maquiavelo allanaria el terreno para una concepcion fluida del genero, permitiendo con ello nuevas formas de pensar la politica y el genero. Si bien la aportacion de Pitkin sera de incuestionable valor para autoras de ambos paradigmas, concluiremos que la mayor variedad de interpretaciones, y las mas utiles para pensar los problemas politicos de la actualidad correspondera a las obras de autoras adscritas al paradigma de Saxonhouse. EnglishThis article will examine the current state of the question on interpretations carried out since the 1980s by North American political science regarding “the women question” in Machiavelli. It will be argued that the three decades worth of analyzed texts on the subject will fit into two possible hermeneutical paradigms. A first one established by Hanna Pitkin since 1984 showing an essentialized genre conception according to which Machiavelli would have been a misogynist with a view on politics with no room for women or femininity, and another which we called protoconstructivist forefronted by Arlene Saxonhouse since 1985 according to which Machiavelli would have paved the way for a fluid conception of gender, thus allowing for the emergence of new ways of thinking about politics and genre. Notwithstanding Pitkin’s work’s unquestionable value for authors pertaining to both paradigms, it will be concluded that the widest and most useful array of interpretations for application on current political challenges will correspond to the works ascribed to Saxonhouse’s paradigm.

Maquiavelo y la mujer. Un estado de la cuestión