English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

now, there is a debate about the “nature” of the Renaissance French writer Michel de Montaigne’s skepticism that could be similar, in some way, to the Quarrel between the Ancient and the Modern. some authors believe that Montaigne was a completely innovative author, who would have broken completely with the ancient skeptical tradition. others, however, feel that he has made little changes in the skeptical arguments and that his role would be reduced to a mere transmitter of the ancient forgotten thought. Faced with both interpretations, it would be our intention, first of all, to explain the relevance of the montanian skepticism, its importance in the work of the author, and second exposing traditional and innovative positions, make clear their limits. This try to conclude the “truly” skeptical nature the of montanian skepticism, innovative and traditional at the same time. In addition, it attempts to resist the classification of dogmatic theories, traditional or renewal, which would seek to impose their own systems rather than read the author in his own terms.Actualmente existe un debate en torno a la “naturaleza” del escepticismo del escritor renacentista francés Michel de Montaigne que puede remedar, en cierto modo, la querella entre los antiguos y los modernos. Algunos autores creen que Montaigne es un completo innovador, que rompió totalmente con la tradición escéptica antigua. otros, sin embargo, piensan que apenas ha aportado novedades a los argumentos escépticos y que su papel se reduce al de mero transmisor del pensamiento antiguo olvidado en la Modernidad. Frente a ambas interpretaciones, nuestra intención será, primero, exponer la relevancia del escepticismo montaniano en sus Essais. En segundo lugar, daremos cuenta de las dos posiciones heurísticas mencionadas, renovadora y tradicional, evidenciando sus límites. Con ello trataremos de concluir el carácter “verdaderamente” escéptico de la skepsis montaniana, innovadora y tradicional a la vez, que se resiste a los intentos de clasificación dogmática de las teorías, tradicionales o renovadoras, que tratan de imponerle sus propios sistemas y no de leer al autor en sus términos

El debate entre los antiguos y los modernos. A propósito de las interpretaciones del escepticismo de Michael de Montaigne