English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this paper are exposed the most relevant methodological decisions made in the study of the groups of Estampa Popular. Those decisions were determined by the hypothesis that these groups were a more complex entity than what had been considered in other studies. This starting point was the base of an approach to our object that was different from the previous ones, which were also critically analysed. According to our research, Estampa Popular had been judged according to values that did not fit its nature and, therefore, other ones are proposed, which are thought to be better to understand these artists in the present.En este articulo se exponen las decisiones metodologicas mas importantes que se tomaron para el estudio de los grupos de Estampa Popular. Estas estuvieron determinadas por una hipotesis de partida: que dichas agrupaciones constituyeron una entidad mas compleja de lo que se habia considerado previamente. Esta apuesta previa llevo a que se efectuara una aproximacion al objeto de estudio alejada de las anteriores, a las que sometia a un analisis critico. De esta manera, se concluyo que Estampa Popular habia sido juzgada segun valores que no se adecuaban a su naturaleza proponiendose otros mas adecuados para comprenderla en la actualidad

Entre la memoria y la historia: método para estudiar la primera red de artistas antifranquistas