English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

espanolLa crisis economica del 2008, cuyos peores efectos se percibieron en los paises desarrollados, reavivo la disputa politica por la hegemonia ideologica. Con ella se evidencio la disfuncion existente entre bienes materiales e inmateriales que produce la sociedad capitalista y la satisfaccion de la ciudadania hacia estos en las democracias consolidadas. Esta disfuncion, como sucedio en Espana y Chile, origino nuevos movimientos politicos que buscaron representar las viejas injusticias irresueltas por la democracia liberal, y las nuevas tensiones que emergieron con y tras la crisis economica. El presente articulo aborda este proceso mediante el analisis comparado de una conjuncion de factores estructurales y supraestructurales, con el fin de comprender la emergencia y consolidacion de Podemos en Espana y Revolucion Democratica en Chile como partidos-movimiento. Para conseguir este objetivo, y desde un marco teorico centrado en las premisas de la democracia radical y el pluralismo agonista y las caracteristicas del partido-movimiento, se explora en las condiciones socioeconomicas, culturales e institucionales que pueden explicar la irrupcion y consolidacion de este tipo de partido politico. A partir de este analisis se concluye que: 1) la emergencia de ambos partidos se explica por las condiciones materiales de desigualdad en ambos paises; 2) en su origen, los dos partidos pueden ser definidos nitidamente como partidos-movimiento; y 3) estos partidos se han convertido en una alternativa a los partidos tradicionales, pero dentro del propio regimen politico que impugnan. EnglishThe financial crisis of 2008, whose worst effects were felt in developed countries, reignited the political dispute over ideological hegemony. It showed the dysfunction existing between material and immaterial goods produced by capitalist society, and the citizenry’s satisfaction with these goods in consolidated democracies. In Spain and Chile, this dysfunction originated new political movements that sought to represent the old unresolved injustices for liberal democracy, and the new tensions that emerged with and after the economic crisis. This article addresses this process through the comparative analysis of a conjunction of structural and supra-structural factors, in order to understand the emergence and consolidation of Podemos in Spain and the Democratic Revolution in Chile as movement-parties. To achieve this goal, and based on a theoretical framework focused on the premises of radical democracy and agonist pluralism and the characteristics of the party-movement, we explore the socioeconomic, cultural and institutional conditions that may explain the emergence and consolidation of this type of "political parties." Based on this analysis, it is concluded that: 1) the emergence of both parties is explained by the material conditions of inequality in both countries; 2) in their origins, the two parties can be clearly defined as movement-parties; and 3) these parties have become an alternative to traditional parties, but within the political regime they are challenging.

El partido-movimiento como expresión de la democracia radical. Emergencia y consolidación de Podemos en España y Revolución Democrática en Chile