English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

espanolDurante la legislatura espanola 2011/2014 se reformo la ley de seguridad ciudadana, popularmente conocida como ley mordaza. A favor y en contra se esgrimieron argumentos relativos a la libertad y la seguridad garantizada o amenazada, segun el punto de vista. En este analisis de contenido se estudian los enfoques mediaticos a que fue expuesta la ciudadania a la hora de informarse al respecto. Para ello se ha analizado la cobertura del proceso legislativo por los ocho periodicos de informacion general con mas lectores diarios. Se concluye 1) que la critica a la reforma, por restrictiva y aun represiva, no solo no fue marginada del discurso mediatico, sino que de hecho tuvo algo mas de presencia en el computo global; 2) que solo en los medios de derecha primo el enfoque securitario; 3) que la presencia de los dos enfoques estuvo mas equilibrada cuanto mas alejados de los extremos ideologicos, y 4) que el patron general se mantuvo estable a lo largo de todo el periodo. EnglishThe Spanish Citizen Security Law or Civil Protection Act was reformed throughout the parliamentary period from 2011 to 2014. It was widely known as the “gag law.” Supportive and opposing arguments were presented regarding both civil liberties and security. According to the point of view of political agents and media, they were either guaranteed or at risk. The aim of this content analysis is to reveal the media frames the citizens were exposed to in trying to be informed. The main conclusions from this study of the coverage of the eight most-read newspapers in Spain are: 1) critical discourse against the reform (because of its restrictive and repressive nature) was not marginal, but even the predominant one; 2) the law and order discourse was only predominant among the rightist newspapers; 3) the two main frames are more covered in similar quantitative terms the more the newspaper is far from the ideological extremes, and 4) that general scheme was stable along the period.

Enfoques mediáticos sobre libertad y seguridad. La Ley española de Seguridad Ciudadana como estudio de caso