English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Recent research gave some visibility to Protohistoric toponyms as tools for the interpretation of the archaeological record, particularly its ethnic identification. This paper discusses, discusses, from a point of view, the anachronistic use of data from Linguistics in the archaeological discourse, especially the formation, transmission and chronology of those toponyms created by unknown languages. This leads us to consider that the relationship established between Archaeology and Toponymy is problematic, especially when there is a remarkable chronological gap between the data they provide. We present some case studies that reveal these problems.

A toponímia proto-histórica como ferramenta do arqueólogo? Comentários sobre uma relação problemática