English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

espanolEl Proyecto MapCom (www.mapcom.es) lanzo en 2017 una encuesta destinada al universo de investigadores en Comunicacion censados como doctores en nomina en los centros universitarios espanoles con grados y postgrados en las carreras de Comunicacion, en sociedades cientificas y en programas de doctorado, solicitandoles via internet cumplimentar un formulario centrado en su experiencia investigadora. En este articulo se ofrecen los datos sobre las condiciones y rendimientos de su actividad Investigadora y de su estatus como investigador, obtenidos en aquella encuesta. Se pregunto sobre cual era su valoracion sobre las condiciones materiales (financiacion, becas y contratos, burocracia, instalaciones), organizacionales (requisitos de las convocatorias, formacion metodologica, redes cientificas, capital humano) e institucionales (compatibilidad con la docencia, relacion Universidad/ empresa, Agencias de Evaluacion, Congresos, Revistas). De estos datos se desprende la tendencia a valorar negativamente las condiciones materiales, mientras que las condiciones organizacionales e institucionales recibieron valoraciones positivas y negativas diversas segun los items. Los rendimientos recibieron valoraciones mas positivas cuando se relacionaban con el corporativismo academico que cuando se vinculaban a la competencia cientifica. EnglishThe MapCom Project (www.mapcom.es) launched a survey in 2017 aimed at researchers in the field of communication who were under contract as Doctors at Spanish universities with graduate or postgraduate Degrees in Communication, or research associations and doctorate programmes. It asked respondents to fill in an online form based on their research experience. In this article we present the data concerning the conditions and performance of the research activity and their status as researchers, obtained from that survey. Interviewees were asked how they rated the working conditions both in terms of material (funding, grants, contracts, red-tape, facilities), organisation (requirements of the call, teaching methodology, scientific networks, human capital) and institutions (compatibility with lecturing, relations between the unversity and the business world. Assessment Agencies, Congresses and Journals). The conclusion was that there was a tendency to have a negative evaluation of materials whereas, in terms of the organisation and institution, the evaluation was a mixture of positive and negative depending on the item considered. The evaluation of performance related to academic corporativism tended to be more positive than those related to scientific competencies.

Condiciones y rendimientos de la Investigación en Comunicación: la visión de los académicos