English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The grammatical theory of the modistae has always been considered to be a clear precedent of the grammatical theory of Sanctius. It is evident that both theories share the same objective of linguistic universality. However, both doctrines seek to achieve that single theoretical objective through very different methodological patterns. In fact, the grammar of the modistae , from the late Middle Ages, and that of Franciscus Sanctius Brocensis (Francisco Sanchez de las Brozas) are separated, as we analyse in our study, by a conflicting conception of linguistic analysis with respect to the figurative discourse, which determines the systematic exclusion of the same in Modistic grammar compared to its rational and systematic study in Sanctian grammar. And this conflicting conception of linguistic analysis has not been highlighted nor emphasised sufficiently, despite being key to properly interpreting these two decisive and transcendental grammatical systems, each providing essential contributions to Western linguistics.

Gramática modista "versus" gramática sanctiana: dos concepciones de análisis lingüístico contrapuestas