English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In Common Law, the general view is that provocation is no defence as such to tort liability; whatever effect it has, is limited to the mitigation of aggravated or exemplary damages. The rationale for this is not clear but the view commands substantial support.1 Thus it seems to be the case in Australia, that no matter how provocative the conduct of the plaintiff may be he is assured of compensatory damages in a tort action against the defendant unless the defendant can rely on self-defence where the circumstances permit.

Provocation in Tort Liability: A Time for Reassessment