English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Background and Objective. The full dental arch on four implants concept is a useful therapy in the treatmentof an edentulous mandible. Few studies have shown the effect of the cantilever length on the peri-implant bone. The aim of the study was to clarify the influence of the cantilever length on the stress and their distribution in the peri-implant bone.Material and Methods. For research purposes, 3-dimensionalfinite element analysis models based on the highest atrophy of an edentulous mandible were constructed. Four dental implants were inserted in interforaminal segment in 4 conditions. The implantswere splinted with a 14-unit bridge. A load of 300 N was applied to the occlusal surface at the end of the cantilever. Results. The lowest peri-implant stresses around the distal implant were in the scheme4-2-2-4; they were by 1% greater in the scheme 4-1-1-4, by 16.7% greater in the scheme 4-3-3-4 and by 71% greater in the scheme 3-2-2-3. The greatest stresses of distal implants peri-implant bone and the lowest bone stresses of central implants were observedin the 3-2-2-3 scheme. A longed cantilever significantly increased the peri-implant overloading around a distal implants in all cases.Conclusions. The research showed that stresses were formed around all implants during a functionalload on the cantilever. The lowest peri-implant stresses were recorded when the implants were positionedaccording to the 4-2-2-4 and 4-1-1-4 scheme.A shortened cantilever significantly reduced the peri-implant overloading around a distal implant up to 358%.

INFLUENCE OF CANTILEVER LENGTH ON STRESS DISTRIBUTION IN PERI-IMPLANT BONE WITH FULL DENTAL ARCH ON FOUR IMPLANTS CONCEPT