English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

It is becoming more common for couples in the United States to have children with the help of In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF). One such couple turned to IVF when the wife was diagnosed with breast cancer. Delaying cancer treatment, the couple underwent IVF and cultivated 13 embryos for future use. After several months of aggressive cancer treatment, the wife recovered but was left unable to bear children naturally. Two years later, the couple divorced. Faced with distributing the frozen embryos, the couple reached an impasse: grant the embryos to the wife so that she could try to have children or grant them to the husband for donation or destruction. This couple's legal battle over the frozen embryos eventually reached the Pennsylvania Superior Court in Reber v. Reiss.

Collaborative Law in Pennsylvania and the Frozen Embryo Debate