English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

For over 150 years, the principle of comity has played a crucial role in American legal jurisprudence in the arena of international law. Comity is the “practice among political entities (as nations, states, or courts of different jurisdictions), involving . . . mutual recognition of legislative, executive, and judicial acts.” At the highest level of generality, comity encourages international judicial courtesy and respect for foreign legal values. With regard to interstate relations, it has shaped the uniquely American doctrine of act of state as well as the international understanding of foreign sovereign immunity. Against the backdrop of Cold War diplomacy in the 1960s, comity also fostered the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR), a treaty that seeks to regulate relations between individual nations and foreign consular officials. The VCCR governs diplomatic protocol such as the establishment and conduct of consular relations and the privileges and immunities of consular officers and offices from the laws of the “receiving State” (the country where the foreign consular office has been established). Its adoption was arguably “the single most important event in the entire history of the consular institution.”

Irreconcilable Differences: How Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon Undermines Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations