English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

On September 21, 2006, a remarkable spectacle unfolded in a hearing room in the Rayburn House Office Building in Washington. A few months earlier, the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee had introduced a resolution impeaching Federal District Judge Manuel L. Real “for high crimes and misdemeanors.” Now, sitting alone at the witness table, the eighty-twoyear-old judge defended himself vigorously against accusations that he had improperly intervened in a bankruptcy case to help a woman whose probation he was supervising after she was convicted of various fraud offenses. At one point a member of the Judiciary Committee directed his gaze at the judge and said, “Judge Real, because of your actions, arguably [a family trust involved in the bankruptcy case] lost tens of thousands of dollars in lost rent and also in attorneys’ fees. Did you feel any responsibility for the losses that were incurred by the . . . trust?” The judge responded in a firm voice, “Mr. Smith, I don’t know anything about the loss.

The Regulation of Judicial Ethics in the Federal System: A Peek Behind Closed Doors