English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this paper, I use primary empirical data obtained through interviews inselected case studies around England to shed light on the neoliberalcharacter of biodiversity offsetting, its interrelationship with governancerescaling processes, and the way the latter influences the distribution ofthe costs and benefits of biodiversity offsetting policies. My results showthat biodiversity offsetting in England has been a reactionary neoliberalpolicy whose implementation has so far been characterized by importantdeficits from an environmental and socio-spatial justice perspective

Biodiversity offsetting in England: governance rescaling, socio-spatial injustices, and the neoliberalization of nature