English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In addition to facilitating peaceful trade and economic development, sovereign territory, territorial waters and international waters arebeing used by various criminal groups that pose threats to governments, businesses and civilian population in Southeast Asia. Nonstatecriminal maritime activities were not receiving appropriate attention as they were overshadowed by traditional military securitychallenges. Yet more and more frequently, the non-traditional actors challenge lines of communication, jeopardize access to strategicresources, complicate traditional defence tasks, and harm the environment. Understanding the nature of non-traditional threats, and theways to combat them, requires international legal, historical and political science analysis within a united problem-oriented approach.A fair critique to pure interest, power and knowledge -based theories of regime formation was developed by E.K. Leonard’s1, whoexplained the evolution of the international system from the global governance perspective. The present study is based on the premisethat pure nation-state approaches are incapable of providing a theoretical ground for addressing the growing influence of internationalcriminal networks in South East Asia. From an international relations theory perspective, the author of this study agrees with D.Snidal2that the hegemonic stability theory has "limits" and is insufficient in describing modern challenges to sustainable international securityregime, including non-traditional threats, where collective action is more efficient from an interest and capability standpoint. At thesame time the author of this study does not share the viewpoint on "marginalization"3 of international law in current international orderdue to its fragmentation and regionalization4 and "global power shifts"5 . The United Nations, as a global institution at the top of thevertical hierarchy of international legal order, and the EU as an example of "self-contained" regime along with other subsystems likeSouth East Asia may have different approaches to global governance, international constitutional order, or particular cases such as themeasure of infringement of human rights when targeting individuals suspected of terrorist links. Yet international law remains the keypart of the Asian and global security regime. The hypothesis of this study is that the "void of governance" regime in territorial andinternational waters provides lucrative environment for developing terrorism, piracy, environmental degradation, and other criminalactivities that pose untraditional threats to the regional security. This "void of governance" regime can be caused by either, or both, dejure or de facto insufficient control over particular marine territories

the international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences

Non-Traditional Security Threats in the Border Areas: Terrorism, Piracy, Environmental Degradation in Southeast Asian Maritime Domain