English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper will describe the evolutionary stages that shaped and built, over the time, a robust and solid relationship between ‘indirect\udsurvey methods’ and knowledge of the ‘architectural matter’, aiming at producing a conservation project for the built heritage.\ud  \udCollecting architectural data by simply drawing them was considered to be inadequate by John Ruskin already in 1845. He strongly\udfelt the need to fix them through that ‘blessed’ invention that was the ‘daguerreotype’. Today taking simple photographs is not\udenough: it is crucial to develop systems able to provide the best graphics supports (possibly in the third dimension) for the\uddevelopment and editing of the architectural project.\ud  \udThis paper will focus not only on the re-examination of historical data, on the research and representation of the ‘sign’, but also on\udthe evolution of technologies and ‘reading methods’, in order to highlight their strengths and weaknesses in the real practice of\udconservation project and in the use of the architectures of the past

the international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences

FROM DAGUERREOTYPES TO DIGITAL AUTOMATIC PHOTOGRAMMETRY. APPLICATIONS AND LIMITS FOR THE BUILT HERITAGE PROJECT