English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

To compute hyperspectral orthophotos of an area, one may proceed like for standard RGB orthophotos : equip an aircraft or a drone\udwith the appropriate camera, a GPS and an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU). The position and attitude data from the navigation\udsensors, together with the collected images, can be input to a bundle adjustment which refines the estimation of the parameters and\udallows to create 3D models or orthophotos of the scene. But most of the hyperspectral cameras are pushbrooms sensors : they acquire\udlines of pixels. The bundle adjustment identifies tie points (using their 2D neighbourhoods) between different images to stitch them\udtogether. This is impossible when the input images are lines. To get around this problem, we propose a method that can be used when\udboth a frame RGB camera and a hyperspectral pushbroom camera are used during the same flight. We first use the bundle adjustment\udtheory to obtain corrected navigation parameters for the RGB camera. Then, assuming a small boresight between the RGB camera\udand the navigation sensors, we can estimate this boresight as well as the corrected position and attitude parameters for the navigation\udsensors. Finally, supposing that the boresight between these sensors and the pushbroom camera is constant during the flight, we can\udretrieve it by matching manually corresponding pairs of points between the current projection and a reference. Comparison between\udthe direct georeferencing and the georeferencing with our method on three flights performed during the Leman-Baikal project shows\udgreat improvement of the ground accuracy

the international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences

CORRECTION OF AIRBORNE PUSHBROOM IMAGES ORIENTATION USING BUNDLE ADJUSTMENT OF FRAME IMAGES