English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The identification of priority management areas (PMAs) isessential for the control of non-point-source (NPS) pollution, especiallyfor a large-scale watershed. However, previous studies have typicallyfocused on small-scale catchments adjacent to specific assessment points;thus, the interactions between multiple river points remain poorlyunderstood. In this study, a multiple-assessment-point PMA (MAP-PMA)framework was proposed by integrating the upstream sources and thedownstream transport aspects of NPS pollution. Daning River watershed wastaken as a case study in this paper, which has demonstrated that theintegration of the upstream input changes was vital for the final PMAs map,especially for downstream areas. Contrary to conventional wisdom, thisresearch recommended that the NPS pollutants could be best controlled amongthe upstream high-level PMAs when protecting the water quality of the entirewatershed. The MAP-PMA framework provided a more cost-effective tool for theestablishment of conservation practices, especially for a large-scalewatershed

Upstream to downstream: a multiple-assessment-point approach for targeting non-point-source priority management areas at large watershed scale