English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

. At the leaf level, stomata control the exchange of water and carbon across the air–leaf interface. Stomatal conductance is typically modeledempirically, based on environmental conditions at the leaf surface. Recently developed stomatal optimization models show great skills at predictingcarbon and water fluxes at both the leaf and tree levels. However, how well the optimization models perform atlarger scales has not been extensively evaluated. Furthermore, stomatal models are often used with simple single-leaf representations of canopy radiative transfer (RT), such asbig-leaf models. Nevertheless, the single-leaf canopy RT schemes do not have the capability to model optical properties of the leaves nor the entirecanopy. As a result, they are unable to directly link canopy optical properties with light distribution within the canopy to remote sensing dataobserved from afar. Here, we incorporated one optimization-based and two empirical stomatal models with a comprehensive RT model in the landcomponent of a new Earth system model within CliMA, the Climate Modelling Alliance. The model allowed us to simultaneously simulate carbon and waterfluxes as well as leaf and canopy reflectance and fluorescence spectra. We tested our model by comparing our modeled carbon and water fluxes andsolar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) to two flux tower observations (a gymnosperm forest and an angiosperm forest) and satellite SIFretrievals, respectively. All three stomatal models quantitatively predicted the carbon and water fluxes for both forests. The optimization model,in particular, showed increased skill in predicting the water flux given the lower error (ca. 14.2 % and 21.8 % improvement for thegymnosperm and angiosperm forests, respectively) and better 1:1 comparison (slope increases from ca. 0.34 to 0.91 for the gymnosperm forest andfrom ca. 0.38 to 0.62 for the angiosperm forest). Our model also predicted the SIF yield, quantitatively reproducing seasonal cycles for bothforests. We found that using stomatal optimization with a comprehensive RT model showed high accuracy in simulating land surface processes. Theever-increasing number of regional and global datasets of terrestrial plants, such as leaf area index and chlorophyll contents, will helpparameterize the land model and improve future Earth system modeling in general.

Testing stomatal models at the stand level in deciduous angiosperm and evergreen gymnosperm forests using CliMA Land (v0.1)