English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

. This paper analyses from a philosophical andinterdisciplinary point of view two master plans of the canton Ticino – thefirst one from 1990, Keynesian, and the second one from 2009, neoliberal.The differences between the former and the latter are highlighted on aconceptual level. While the former stresses the importance of rebalancingand maintaining internal solidarity between the regions of the canton, thelatter aims to make the canton more competitive and specialised. Thediscussion highlights how this type of analysis, by showing the politicaland moral concepts and criteria underlying a master plan, favours theirpolitical discussion and thus, ultimately, the implementation of a moreinclusive planning process.

Territorial justice and equity criteria – spatial planning in Ticino