English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We compare the sea surface wind fields forecasted by aGlobal Circulation Model (GCM) and three Limited Area Models (LAMs) in anoperational-like set-up, with the wind remotely sensed by the NASA QuikSCATscatterometer. The comparison is performed for a single case of Bora wind inthe Adriatic Sea, with the purpose to understand the ability of the modelforecasts in reproducing the mesoscale features captured by thescatterometer, and to investigate on the suitability of LAM and GCMforecasts as possible forcing in storm surge models (SSMs). The performanceis evaluated by means of statistical parameters regarding wind speed and direction showing that, at least in terms of classical statistical parameters, the GCM offer the most advantageous choice in terms ofcost/benefit

Numerical models sea surface wind compared to scatterometer observations for a single Bora event in the Adriatic Sea