English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

. Satellite retrievals of XCO2 at northern high latitudes currently have sparser coverage and lower data quality than most other regions ofthe world. We use a neural network (NN) to filter Orbiting CarbonObservatory 2 (OCO-2) B10 bias-corrected XCO2 retrievals and compare the quality of the filtered data tothe quality of the data filtered with the standard B10 quality control filter. To assess the performance of the NN filter, we use Total CarbonColumn Observing Network (TCCON) data at selected northern high latitude sites as a truth proxy. We found that the NN filter decreases the overallbias by 0.25 ppm (∼ 50 %), improves the precision by 0.18 ppm (∼ 12 %), and increases the throughput by 16 %at these sites when compared to the standard B10 quality control filter. Most of the increased throughput was due to an increase in throughputduring the spring, fall, and winter seasons. There was a decrease in throughput during the summer, but as a result the bias and precision wereimproved during the summer months. The main drawback of using the NN filter is that it lets through fewer retrievals at the highest-latitude ArcticTCCON sites compared to the B10 quality control filter, but the lower throughput improves the bias and precision.

Assessing the feasibility of using a neural network to filter Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2) retrievals at northern high latitudes