English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Extensive ozone measurements were made during the second SAGE III Ozone Loss andValidation Experiment (SOLVE II).  We compare high-latitude line-of-sight (LOS)slant column ozone measurements from the NASA DC-8 to ozone simulated by forwardintegration of measurement-derived ozone fields constructed both with andwithout the assumption of horizontal homogeneity.  The average bias and rmserror of the simulations assuming homogeneity are relatively small (−6 and10%, respectively) in comparison to the LOS measurements.  The comparisonimproves significantly (−2% bias; 8% rms error) using forward integrationsof three-dimensional proxy ozone fields reconstructed from potentialvorticity-O<sub>3</sub> correlations.  The comparisons provide additional verificationof the proxy fields and quantify the influence of large-scale ozoneinhomogeneity.  The spatial inhomogeneity of the atmosphere is a source of errorin the retrieval of trace gas vertical profiles and column abundance from LOSmeasurements, as well as a complicating factor in intercomparisons that includeLOS measurements at large solar zenith angles

Comparison of high-latitude line-of-sight ozone column density with derived ozone fields and the effects of horizontal inhomogeneity