English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

. The suggestion of Huang et al. (2015) on the climatological-scale transportof Asian dust to the Arctic appears to be an important and worthwhileassertion. It is unfortunate that the authors undermined, to a certaindegree, the quality of that assertion by a misinterpretation of the critical24 March 2010 Arctic event (which was chosen by the authors to illustratetheir generalized, climatological-scale Arctic transport claim). Theyattempted to characterize that key event using AERONET/AEROCAN retrievalstaken a day later and misinterpreted those largely cloud-dominatedretrievals as being representative of Asian dust while apparently notrecognizing that the coarse-mode aerosol optical depth retrievals on the previous day were actually coherent with their Arctic transport hypothesis.

Comment on “Short-cut transport path for Asian dust directly to the Arctic: a case Study” by Huang et al. (2015) in Environ. Res. Lett.​​​​​​​

Comment on “Short-cut transport path for Asian dust directly to the Arctic: a case Study” by Huang et al. (2015) in Environ. Res. Lett.