English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

CONTEXT  Lacerations are a common occurrence in urgent care and emergency room settings. The types of lacerations repaired in these settings range from superficial and linear to deep and stellate. Healthcare professionals are required to describe these wounds in documentation and part of that description is length. In a busy clinical setting, many providers use a visual estimation of wound length for documentation. The purpose of this exploratory pilot study was to systematically examine the factors (e.g., sex, residency year, prior laceration training) associated with overall accuracy of five laceration length estimates made on a series of five identically-marked linear dummy torso sutured lacerations by a convenience sample of Emergency Medicine (EM) resident physicians. Before the study, the authors hypothesized that laceration estimates from later-year residents and/or those with more prior laceration training would be more accurate.    METHODS  The EM residents who attended a statewide educational session were encouraged to participate in the study by independently entering information concerning their a) personal characteristics, and b) five laceration length estimates from five dummy torso sutured lacerations onto hard copy forms during break and lunch periods of the daylong conference. The use of any types of measurement devices was prohibited.    RESULTS  A total non-probability convenience sample of 107 participants (93 EM resident physicians and 14 medical student attendees) from 14 different Michigan-based EM residency programs completed a 10-item survey during the educational conference. Results for both composite and individual actual-to-estimated (AE) laceration differences varied widely within the sample, with up to 58.9% of laceration over estimates hypothetically having resulted in overbilling of payers for the laceration repair.    CONCLUSIONS  The considerable range in laceration estimates obtained from these EM clinicians indicate the complexity of attempting to estimate lacerations without measuring devices, as well as the potential for over-billing under such conditions. Larger resident samples recording laceration length estimates, with testing of potential interaction effects on AE patterns, are needed in the future to provide additional evidence concerning this aspect of EM billing.

Billing Implications of Emergency Medicine Resident Physicians’ Laceration Length Estimates