English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objectives: Laparoscopic hysterectomy is currently performed in a large number of patients. We investigated the recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival rates of laparoscopic vs. abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer. Methods: The study included 240 patients with stage IA endometrial cancer (endometrial adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma G1/G2) who underwent surgical treatment between 2007 and 2017. Laparoscopy was performed in 97 (laparoscopy group [L group]) and laparotomy in 143 patients (laparotomy group [O group]). We performed an intergroup comparison of recurrence, DFS, and overall survival rates. Results: No intergroup differences were observed in recurrence (5.2% [L group] vs. 7.3% [O group]), DFS (90.3% [L group] vs. 94.1% [O group]), and overall survival rates (98.8% [L group] vs. 97.3% [O group]). Conclusions: Long-term prognosis of laparoscopic surgery was not inferior to that of laparotomy for early-stage

Prognostic outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy vs. total abdominal hysterectomy for early-stage endometrial carcinoma