English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

According to the provisions of Article 41 Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan regulates the consequences of breaking up marriage due to divorce, while Article 149 Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) specifically regulates the consequences of divorce by the husband only. Based on the provisions of Article 149 of the Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) that in the case of divorce in general the judge does not punish the husband to giving mut'ah and iddah. But in the case No. 318/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Mtp, the Judges adjudicates the divorce case using his Ex officio's rights and punishes the defendant (husband) to pay iddah and mut'ah's even though the plaintiff (wife) did not demand and the defendant never attended the trial. This study aims to determine how judges consider the provision of mut'ah and iddah livelihoods in a divorce case and to find out how the juridical analysis of the verdict in the case. The type of research used in this research is normative juridical legal research that discusses doctrines or principles in legal science with a statutory and conceptual approach, then analyzed qualitatively juridically so that it can provide answers to the problems in this study. The results of this research are: 1) Implementation of the ex officio judges by punishing the ex-husband to pay mut'ah and iddah to the ex-wife in the case 318/Pdt.G/2020/PA.MTP is in accordance with the provisions of Article 41 letter (c) Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 jo Article 149 letter a Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) but nevertheless the judge struck down the verdict above what is required so as to deviate from the provision regulated in Article 178 paragraph (3) HIR / Article 189 paragraph (3) RBg and violate the rule of ultra petita. 2) The punishment of the defendant should consider the presence of ex-husband also the ability and necessity of a decent life for the ex-husband/defendant, as the principle of audi et alteram partem in Article 4 paragraph (1) of Undang-UndangNo. 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman, so as not to result in an unenforceable verdict (illusoir).

ANALISIS YURIDIS HAK EX OFFICIO HAKIM DALAM PERKARA CERAI GUGAT (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Agama Martapura Nomor 318/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Mtp)