English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The institute of agreements is a relatively new institution in Ukrainian legislation, which is why it is paid attention by many scholars, and during its practical application, it is actively formed and adapted to the legal consciousness of our society. However, compared to European countries, the United States of America, and many of our immediate neighbors, it is still not fully implemented and needs to be improved. Thus, this research deals with prosecutor activities in criminal proceeding after the indictment with the signed agreement are sent to court. In particular, attention is paid to the participation of the prosecutor in the preparatory hearing during the court’s consideration of the agreement concluding possibility. Consideration features in comparison with the preparatory proceedings general order are allocated (voluntariness questions of the agreement conclusion, non-observance of the agreement conditions, etc. are considered). The issues of narrowing procedural rights of the parties to the agreement are analyzed and based on current national legislation in comparison with the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights a conclusion is offered on the possibility of restriction of appeal against the court verdict on the basis

PROSECUTOR ACTIVITIES IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AFTER THE INDICTMENT WITH THE SIGNED AGREEMENT ARE SENT TO COURT