Investigation of Positive Streptococcus pneumoniae Urinary Antigen Test Results in a Korean University Hospital
Author(s) -
InSuk Kim,
EunHa Koh,
SunJoo Kim,
Kook Young Maeng,
Hyun Ju Jung
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
korean journal of clinical microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1229-0025
DOI - 10.5145/kjcm.2010.13.1.14
Subject(s) - medicine , streptococcus pneumoniae , pneumonia , sputum , urinary system , sputum culture , urine , pneumococcal pneumonia , blood culture , emergency department , medical record , community acquired pneumonia , gastroenterology , microbiology and biotechnology , pathology , tuberculosis , antibiotics , biology , psychiatry
Background: The Streptococcus pneumoniae urinary antigen test (SPUAT) (Binax Now, USA) was developed for detecting polysaccharide C in urine samples for rapid diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia, the most common cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). To validate positive results of these tests, we retrospectively investigated all positive results obtained from the emergency room of a Korean university hospital among patients with suspected CAP. Methods: One hundred twenty-three positive SPUAT results were abstracted and analyzed from the authors' laboratory information system among the SPUAT results performed from 1,143 pneumonic patients admitted from the emergency room of a university hospital between 2007 and 2008. Medical records, including conventional microbiologic analysis results, were reviewed in detail for all positive test results. Results: Among 123 patients with the positive SPUAT results, 24 patients were excluded due to hospitalization history during the preceding month. Nine of 99 patients (9.1%) with suspected CAP had confirmed pneumococcal pneumonia upon conventional sputum or blood culture. Thirty-five positive results (35.4%) showed other microorganisms upon conventional methods, which might be due to possible cross-reactivity. Among those, 23 positive results were considered bacterial pneumonic agents, and 12 positive results were regarded as urinary tract infection strains or contaminating agents. Fifty-five positive SPUAT results (55.6%) showed negative conventional microbiologic growth, and some positive SPUAT results might be caused by true pneumococcal infection although without cultural evidence. Conclusion: Our retrospective study demonstrated that a positive SPUAT result typically does not agree well with conventional culture methods, suggesting that the value of a positive SPUAT result in etiology determination may be limited under practical conditions in a university hospital. (Korean J Clin Microbiol 2010;13:14-18)
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom