English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This study evaluates the performance of the three latest video codecs H.265/MPEG-HEVC, H.264/MPEGAVC\udand VP9. The evaluation is based on both subjective and objective quality metrics. The assessment\udmetric Double Stimulus Impairment Scale (DSIS) is used to evaluate the subjective quality of the\udcompressed video sequences. The Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) metricis used for the objective\udevaluation. Moreover, this work studies the effect of frame rate and resolution on the encoders’\udperformance. The extensive number of experiments are conducted with similar encoding configurations for\udthe three studied encoders. The evaluation results show that H.265/MPEG-HEVC provides superior bitrate\udsaving capabilities compared to H.264 and VP9. However, VP9 shows lower encoding time than\udH.265/MPEG-HEVC but higher encoding time compared to H.264. \u

Performance Evaluation of h.265/mpeg-hevc, vp9 and h.264/mpeg-avc Video Coding