English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Collaborative filtering (CF) recommender systems are typically unable to generate adequate recommendations in sparse datasets. Empirical evidence suggests that incorporation of a trust network among the users of a recommender system can significantly help to alleviate this problem. For this reason, some studies have been done on combining CF with trust-enhanced recommender system. In this study, we analyze the switching hybrid recommender system with the CF and trust-enhanced recommender system components from both rating coverage and mean absolute error point of view. Experiments on a dataset from Epinions.com prove that, although the rating coverage of this hybrid method is better than both (CF and trust-enhanced RS), but has lower accuracy than just using trust-enhanced RS. In other words, trust-enhanced RS outperforms the hybrid recommender system consisting of CF and trust-enhanced RS. Finally, we justify this result using analytical method.

Is Always a Hybrid Recommender System Preferable To Single Techniques?