English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In December 2012 the European Union (EU) Commission announced that it will propose a  revision of the 2001 Tobacco Products Directive (TPD). This paper traces the policy debate that followed, in order to highlight some of the intricacies of the research-policy nexus. It focuses on the voting decisions of the Polish Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) during the European Parliament vote on the TPD in October 2013. The presented analysis employs a variety of theoretical models, including the engineering, enlightenment and strategic models of evidence-based policy making, the “two communities” model, framing, as well as Black’s list of reasons for why research evidence has little influence on service policies. The analysis demonstrates that a linear model of relation between research and policy is of little value in understanding the EU TPD voting outcomes due to the broad and strongly antagonistic nature of the advocacy coalitions competing to influence the political decisions of the MEPs on this issue.

Evidence-based policy making? The case of Polish opposition to the EU Tobacco Products Directive