English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The most common applications of flow cytometry (FC) include diagnostics of haemato-oncological disorders, based on analysis of bone marrow, peripheral blood (PB), or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples. A proper diagnostic process requires standardisation in setting the optimal time frame between material collection and the assay. Unfortunately, this might be difficult to achieve in daily practice due to unintended shipment delays, which might compromise large-scale multicentre studies. Thus, material fixation should be considered as a solution. The most widely used fixative agents are: paraformaldehyde, TransFix ® , Cyto-Chex ® , and serum-containing media. In this review, we attempted to summarise the literature data on the influence of sample storage under different temperatures and times combined with different fixation conditions on the cell count and marker expression levels. Based on the findings of several extensive studies employing fixed PB samples, it can be concluded that the performance of particular fixative greatly depends on the analysed marker and specific PB cell population expressing a given antigen. Preservation of absolute cell count was usually better in Cyto-Chex ® -fixed PB samples, whereas TransFix ® tended to better stabilise marker expression levels. CSF-based studies reveal that both serum-containing media and TransFix ® can prevent cellular loss and enhance FC-based detection of leptomeningeal localisations of haematological malignancies, the latter being more available and having longer shelf-life. As both cell count and marker expression level are the main determinants of quality of biological samples dedicated to FC analyses, it remains to be addressed by the investigators which is the fixative of choice for their specific research aims.

The influence of fixation of biological samples on cell count and marker expression stability in flow cytometric analyses