English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Determining differences and patterns in the responses might lead to understand over-excitability of students with high cognitive ability and to design treatments for helping them in controlling stress.    Material and methods  A comparative research method was used with three different instruments. The data were analyzed by t-test and Welch’s F-test.    Results  The SHCA reported significantly higher frequencies of psychological stress responses whereas they expressed significantly lower frequencies of physiological stress responses than their counterparts.cantly lower frequencies of physiological stress responses than their counterparts.    Conclusions  These findings might lead to a discussion about the factors determining differences in the responses given by students with high cognitive ability under stress conditions.

Is cognitive ability a factor in explaining differences in physiological and psychological stress responses?