English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Digital environments are able to provide corrective feedback such as knowledge of response (KR: correct/incorrect) or knowledge of correct response (KCR: the correct answer is X), along with elaborated feedback (EF: explanations). It is common to assume that students process EF, although recent research shows that this is not always the case, probably because of the corrective feedback provided along with EF. The main goal of this study is to analyze the voluntary decision to access EF depending on KR and KCR feedback received immediately after answering questions from a science text. Secondary students received corrective feedback according to the condition assigned: KR, KCR, or control (i.e., non-corrective feedback). Afterwards, all the students could access EF, that included an explanation about the knowledge assessed. Results suggest that receiving KR and KCR feedback decreases the use of EF compared to control feedback, although there are no differences in the final learning.

¿Influye la Retroalimentación Correctiva en el Uso de la Retroalimentación Elaborada en un Entorno Digital?