English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The Supreme Court’s 2011 Brown v. Plata decision may mark a turning point in the history of mass incarceration in California and nationwide. Between the mid-1970s and 2009 the California prison population grew absolutely and relative to population every year, expanding more than any other large state and continuing to grow even after much of the rest of the country had begun to stabilize or even shrink prison populations. Since the court injunction that was upheld in Brown v. Plata, however, the state has begun to shrink its population at one of the fastest paces in history and is also experimenting with changes in its pro-imprisonment penal policies. However a look at the parallel history of prisoners’ rights litigation and mass incarceration in California, particularly the Toussaint v. McCarthy case that took place between 1976 and 1991, shows that the two developed together and that the state’s increasingly uncivilized and degrading prisons reflected a political culture of defiance to constitutional rights developed reactively to litigation. Will Brown v. Plata play out any differently? The article suggests some reasons why today’s decisions may be more effective in overcoming the state’s hostile penal culture than in the past.

Courts and the Penal State: Lessons from California’s Decades of Prison Litigation and Expansion