English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

THE CALIFORNIA Journal of Politics & Policy Volume 3, Issue 4 The Politicization of Evidence-Based Medicine: The Limits of Pragmatic Problem Solving in an Era of Polarization Alan S. Gerber Yale University Eric M. Patashnik University of Virginia Abstract A key test of a political system is its capacity to solve important societal problems. Few policy areas in the U.S. are more problem-ridden than health care. Medical care is expensive and wasteful, and the quality often falls short of best practice. One idea to improve health care is to eliminate gaps in the medical evidence base through “comparative effectiveness research” (CER). By identifying what treatments, tests, and technologies work best, CER could help doctors, patients, and payers make better decisions and help reduce wasteful spending. CER was a technocratic, third- tier issue familiar mainly to policy experts based in universities, foundations, and think tanks, but hardly anyone else. This paper traces how this obscure policy ini- tiative got caught up in the wider ideological struggle over national health reform . Keywords: health care reform, The Affordable Health Care Act, comparative ef- fectiveness research, evidence-based medicine Copyright © 2011 The Berkeley Electronic Press. All rights reserved. www.bepress.com/cjpp